This proposal will turn World Heritage seabed, surrounded by National Park and a publicly accessible foreshore with spectacular views, into private property. The marine habitat will be destroyed, and the views obliterated by high buildings and high breakwaters. This will be replaced with:
Another step in the 'Death of a thousand cuts' approach to managing development on the Great Barrier Reef.
This project will obliterate high-conservation value, productive seagrass habitat surrounded by Marine Park and National Park, home to dugongs, turtles and juvenile fish.
The reclamation of seabed is listed as a 'threatening process' to the health of the Great Barrier Reef by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority.
Increased boat traffic will result in the deaths of sea turtles as their habitat is replaced by a marina. These animals do not just 'go somewhere else'; they are site attached and will keep returning until they are killed by a boat propeller.
This style of development is a thing of the past.
Developments which rely on destruction of public assets such as productive seabed habitats, in order to create private real estate and profits, are dinosaurs from the 1980s and should be a thing of the past.
This proposal is likely to cost Whitsunday ratepayers dearly
The track record of proposals such as this one in Queensland is not good. More often than not developments run out of money long before they are completed, leaving ratepayers to clean up the mess and finish off what has been started, and leaving promises made to the public unfulfilled.
Can we expect more of this?
See what is proposed for Shute Harbour: Shute Harbour Marina Resort brochure.
Save World Heritage Shute Harbour
The Save Our Foreshore organisation is totally opposed to what it sees as nothing more than yet another public waterfront land grab for high end residences - using a marina as its justification.
Can we expect more of this?
If this development on our public foreshore is approved, many thousands of locals and visitors will lose an irreplaceable environmental and scenic treasure, primarily so a private developer can on-sell reclaimed blocks of World Heritage seabed land to third-party developers.
- Download our Shute Harbour background document
- Download Shute Harbour: The Real Story.
- Download Shute Harbour Supplementary EIS notes.
- Have your say: Make your own supplementary EIS submission
- How big is this development?
- Dr. J.E.N. Veron's objection (Former Chief Scientist, Australian Institute of Marine Science)
- Prof. Frank Talbot's objection (Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Director Emeritus, US National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution)
Ask around and you will find a majority of Whitsunday residents are prepared to fight vigorously against the proposed Shute Harbour marina development; they continue to see it, after all these years, as still very dodgy - a clear landgrab that possibly only the naive would doubt.
Sadly, Minister Seeney’s recent statement about a ‘world class facility’ at Shute exactly echoes sentiments expressed prior to the failed and uncompleted Abel Point, Port of Airlie and Laguna Quays marinas, which have empty berths year round to this day, some with huge ponds of impossible-to-dispose-of acid sulphate soil - all precipitously on the brink of the fragile World Heritage Great Barrier Reef. Shute’s tidal movements, it’s deep layer of silt, it’s position at the heart of the Reef, make it a dead cert for disaster if this goes ahead.
The questionable 30+year history of this proposal, the lack of need, the lack of financial capability, lack of adequate answers to the to the Environmental Impact Study and the current weak supplementary EIS, plus the disregard for overwhelming and blindlingly clear evidence that makes the proposal a looming disaster, may not yet have been drawn to the responsible minister’s attention.
Ratepayers and struggling businesses are already burdened with unexpected, over-inflated costs from the local council’s insolvency and the failed Port of Airlie – they don’t want to shoulder the infrastructure expenses and loss of business guaranteed if this project goes ahead..
The Whitsundays has endured negative press while trying to promote the ‘green and blue’ ethos of the region. Why? Because of bad decision making by ‘the powers that be’. We ask Mr Seeney, please, please not to join those ranks and make it even worse. We don’t need another 15 years of visual/traffic/tourism chaos here in what should otherwise be rightly one of Australia’s most beautiful destinations.
Minister Seeney has a prime opportunity to dutifully serve the people of the Whitsundays, of Queensland and tourists world wide by protecting the reefs and waterways, the bays and crucial mangrove areas, the already strained economy of our region by just saying ‘no’ to this highly questionable proposal.
An objection by Dr. J.E.N. Veron:
"As one of the few people who have worked on all the major coral reef regions of the world, I have become increasingly concerned about reef degradation that comes from coastal urbanisation. Australia stands almost alone in having extensive reefs that are still undamaged from this cause and thus I have long supported the efforts of GBRMPA to protect the Great Barrier Reef through managing coastal environments. The connection between reefs and adjacent land is now only too obvious: reefs degrade when coastal ecosystems are not preserved.
"Shute Harbour is one of the best-know components of the world’s most highly treasured reef region. Development of the foreshore is not in the national interest and nor is it long-term interest of the region. Unlike most of the world, we Australians still have a choice – either we conserve such places, or we loose them forever. When future generations look back, I hope they will see good management decisions where our best foreshore environments have been preserved for all time.
An objection by Professor F. H. Talbot:
"Dear the Hon. Jan Jarratt MP, Member for Whitsunday,
"I have worked on coral reefs for over 40 years, on the GBR since 1965, in the Caribbean, and on the reefs of East Africa and Zanzibar and also New Guinea, and published papers on reef ecology and recently a book on reef management (Coral Reefs, Mangroves and Seagrasses: A Sourcebook for Managers; F.Talbot & C.Wilkinson, 2001; Australian Institute of Marine Science).
"Sadly I have watched the steady decline of reef systems. The reasons have been many, including forest clearing, urbanisation, sewage pollution, over-fishing and the removal of wetlands and mangroves.
"You have a gem in the Whitsunday area, and one that attracts thousands of tourists, many of them in yachts. The number of vessels is now so high that many anchorages that are destinations for the yachts are becoming crowded. More marina berths are already under way. I suggest you do not accept the very large Shute Harbour marina development in addition, as you are overburdening the area and damaging its shallow water systems.
"You will already know that the inshore reefs along much of the GBR are less than pristine. This new Shute Harbour development, destroying rich shallow ecosystems, just adds to the steady pressure on the reef in the Whitsunday area.
"The fame of the GBR is well known, but reef systems are common in the Indian and Pacific Ocean tropics...if the word was out that the GBR was tired, your tourists would flock to better reefs.
"Rather than slowly kill your golden goose, I suggest this development will do too much harm to the Whitsundays. You would be wise to prevent it.
Professor F. H. Talbot, Sydney Institute of Marine Science
Director Emeritus, US National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution"